Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Tropical Community and One Health undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to maintain objectivity and scientific integrity.

1. Initial Screening (Editor-in-Chief / Section Editor)

  • Manuscripts are first evaluated for scope alignment, originality, structure, and adherence to author guidelines.

  • The editor may reject submissions at this stage if they do not meet basic scientific or ethical standards.

2. Plagiarism Check

  • All manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection software.

  • Manuscripts containing excessive similarity or unethical content will be rejected.

3. Double-Blind Peer Review

  • Suitable manuscripts are assigned to at least two independent experts in the relevant field.

  • Reviewers evaluate the scientific quality, methodology, significance, originality, clarity, and ethical compliance of the manuscript.

4. Reviewer Decision

Reviewers will recommend one of the following:

  • Accept without revision

  • Minor revision

  • Major revision

  • Resubmit for review

  • Reject

5. Author Revision

  • Authors are required to address all reviewer comments and submit a detailed response.

  • Revised manuscripts may be sent back to reviewers for re-evaluation if needed.

6. Final Decision

  • The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision based on reviewer recommendations and editorial judgment.

  • Accepted papers proceed to copyediting and layout process before publication.

7. Publication

  • After final proofreading and formatting, the article is published in the next scheduled issue.